The constitutional amendment would do
several things related to limiting state and local
government from transferring or taking private property for
public use, Proposition 98 on the ballot for June
3 would:
RENT CONTROL
* Would impact and eventually
abolish all existing rent control measures now in place and
prevent new controls from being enacted. Over a dozen
cities in California have some form of rent control laws
including cities of Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oakland, San
Francisco, San Jose, and Santa Monica.
Over 100 cities and counties have laws limiting or
controlling the rents that mobilehome park owners can
charge people who lease space.
* Local governments would be
prohibited from enacting any new rent control measures
* Any rent control measure that was
enacted AFTER January 1, 2007 would end (upon passage of
this ballot initiative)
* Other rent control measures enacted
BEFORE January 1, 2007 would be phased out on a unit by unit
basis after an apartment unit or mobile home park space is
vacated. Once a tenant vacates an apartment or mobile
home space, property owners can charge higher rents (market
rate rents) for the next person - and that housing would not
be subject to rent control again.
OTHER HOUSING MEASURES
* Legislative Analyst Office
believes, while wording in the proposed constitutional
amendment is not clear, it appears that other affordable
housing laws could be prohibited, such as local mandatory
"inclusionary" housing laws (ordinances) that
require developers to construct affordable housing on part
of their land or contribute funds for such housing.
TRANSFERRING PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
* Proposition 98 on the ballot June
3rd, would prohibit local government from taking
ownership of private property and transfer it to a private
party (such as a non-profit organization, business or
person. This includes when local government seeks to reduce
high crime or urban decay in a certain area by transferring
substandard apartments to a non-profit organization to
renovate and manage for affordable housing for low income
people and families (that include people with disabilities
and seniors).
* Would prohibit local government
from taking a private property and transferring it for use
that was "substantially similar" to how the
original private owner used it.
* None of these restrictions apply if
local government was addressing a public nuisance or
criminal activity or as part of a "state of
emergency" declared by the Governor.
* Local government could still
continue to take private property for facilities that it
would own and use, such as new schools, roads, parks and
other public facilities.
Proposition 99 Similar To 98
But Does Not End Rent Controls
*One other proposition, Proposition
99, is also on the June 3rd primary ballot and is similar
to Proposition 98, but does not contain any provisions
dealing with rent controls. It was placed on the ballot by
some of the groups in strong opposition to Proposition 98.
* Proposition 99 has a clause that
if both Proposition 98 and 99 were approved by voters, and
if Proposition 99 received more votes than 98, then the
provisions of Proposition would not take effect.
* Proposition 99, like Proposition
98, is a constitutional amendment would prohibit
state and local government from using their power (called
"eminent domain") to acquire an owner-occupied
home and transfer it to another private person or business
entity. It creates an exception for public works or
improvements, public health and safety protection and
crime prevention.
* It is similar to Proposition 98
in that it would prevent local government from
transferring a substandard apartment building, for
instance, to a non-profit organization to renovate and
manage affordable housing.
* Proposition 99 is supported by
the California Alliance for Retired Americans, the League
of Women Voters of California, the League of California
Homeowners and the California Police Chiefs Association
among other groups who say that Proposition 99 "is
real eminent domain reform" with "no hidden
agenda" of eliminating rent controls.
* Proposition 99 is opposed by the
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, the California Farm
Bureau, representatives of the National Federal of
Independent Business Owners, who say Proposition 99
"does nothing" to protect homeowners, family
farmers, small businesses, citing the Legislative Analyst
Office's analysis which says that it "would not
change significantly current government land acquisition
practices."
BE
SURE TO VOTE JUNE 3rd PRIMARY
The deadline to register for the June primary has passed
(May 19th).
See CDCAN website for more information at www.cdcan.us
JUNE 3, 2008 STATE PRIMARY ELECTION
* Voter registration must be postmarked no later than May
19, 2008
NOVEMBER 4, 2008 GENERAL (PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION)
* Voter registration must be postmarked no later than
October 20, 2008
FOR MORE INFORMATION
For additional assistance with voter registration, please
contact your county registrar of voters or the California
Secretary of State's office at the following toll-free
numbers:
English: 1-800-345-VOTE
Chinese: 1-800-339-2857
Japanese: 1-800-339-2865
Korean: 1-866-575-1558
Spanish: 1-800-232-VOTA
Tagalog: 1-800-339-2957
Vietnamese: 1-800-339-8163
PROBLEMS OR
BARRIERS IN VOTING?
HOTLINE ELECTION NUMBER:
* PAI’s hotline is equipped to receive voice and
TDD calls.
* The toll-free number for voice calls is: 800-776-5746.
* The toll-free number for TDD calls is: 800-781-4546.
Individuals who speak languages other than English should
state their language and an interpreter will be connected
to the call. Callers who wish to use the California Relay
Service, Speech to Speech Service or Video Relay can dial
711.
* With funding from the federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA),
Protection and Advocacy, Inc. (PAI) is sponsoring a
toll-free hotline for voters with disabilities who have
difficulty accessing polling places, casting ballots or
have general questions about the voting process. This is
the 4th year PAI has operated the hotline.
* The purpose of the hotline is to fix problems on
Election Day that are causing persons with disabilities
that causes loss of voting rights.
* Such problems and barriers include:
- limited access to registration materials
- wrong information from providers, conservators,
relatives, and facility staff about the person's right to
vote
- judges who take away a person's right to vote when they
should not
- transportation problems getting to and from the
polls
- problems about access to polls or to election ballot for
people living in nursing homes and other facilities
- problems about access barriers at polling places such as
very limited or no accessible parking or curb ramps;
doorways and aisles that are too narrow; voting equipment
placed on inaccessible tables or stages; poor disability
access trainings for poll workers; and, poll sites said to
be "accessible" when they are not.